When it comes to bringing in revenue and making headlines, law firms do a hell of job. The biggest ones bring in millions, even billions of dollars. They argue before the Supreme Court. They help shape global economies.
When it comes to designing websites, though, these firms are clueless. These are the folks who often charge upwards of $1000 per hour for their services, and yet their websites look like the work of some cut-rate freelance designers.
Accident lawyers can't help but to homogonize insurance companies. But the reality is that they are all very different with different models and agendas.
On our Maryland car accident claim overview on our website, we provide on the bottom right hand side a summary of our lawyers' thoughts on dealing with 18 - count them, 18! - insurance companies who handle claims in Maryland.
The Western District Missouri Court of Appeals last week affirmed a $ 950,000 jury verdict in a motorcycle accident case, concluding that the condition of the road during construction was the primary cause of the man's injuries.
The jury award surprises me. Plaintiff was driving his motorcycle through an "inactive" construction zone. While passing a truck at 70 miles per hour, he lost control of his motorcycle as the result of uneven payment, a nearly two inch difference in the grades. (Arguably that 70 mph did not help, either.)
Plaintiff's lawsuit alleged the motorcycle accident would not have occurred if there had been proper warning of the uneven surfaces. The jury largely agreed, finding the defendants 95% at fault for the accident and the motorcyclist only 5% at fault (which would lead to a defense verdict under Maryland law).
http://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=51217
Continue reading "Motorcycle Accident Verdict Affirmed" »
Tuesday, the National Transportation Safety Board called for a nationwide ban on the use of cell phones and text messaging devices while driving although the recommendation is not, as it probably should be, for hands-free phones (or passengers). Maryland already had passed a similar law.
This recommendation underscores that the federal government is growing increasingly concerned by statistics that show cell phones are killing people in massive numbers. What would have been more impressive is asking for a ban on cell phones for drivers. Period. But regardless of the death toll, that is not in the political cards, at least not now.
In Dunbar v. State Farm, a federal judge in Oklahoma granted summary judgment to State Farm in what was really a silly bad faith case.
This case involved a pedestrian accident where somebody backed out of their driveway and hit someone. USAA tendered, albeit slowly, its $100,000 limits for the at-fault driver. State Farm did what it does, it slowly increased the offers over time. But in this case, medical records were provided, for whatever reason, over time, making State Farm's increase in offers seem quite reasonable. Eventually, State Farm tended its entire policy of $200,000. Because it was an uninsured motorist case, that should have resolved the claim. But Plaintiff's accident lawyer proceeded with the claim under the theory that State Farm should have made the offer sooner, but was dragging their feet.
I don't get it. Neither did the appellate court.
The opinion also underscores Oklahoma law (and Maryland law) that regardless of the severity of injury, an underinsured claim does not kick in until the underlying policy tenders its limits. So if you have a death case and the at fault driver has a $30,000 policy, the underinsured motorist coverage obligations do not kick in until the underlying policy has been offered.
David Stratton, a defense lawyer with Jordan Coyne & Savits, provides a link on his blog to an interactive map that shows the location of road accident fatalities between 2001 and 2009. If you allow yourself to move past the dry statistics and really think about what you are seeing - even for an instant - it is terribly depressing. It makes me wonder: exactly how much would it cost - in time and money - to cut this figure in half? Lower the speed limits? Require car makers to build safer cars? More restrictions on truck drivers? I'm not saying we should do this. But I sure would like someone to do an estimate so we can figure out what the tab would be.
In Carr v. Cinnamon, a California appellate court applied the same rule we have here in Maryland: the finder of fact can award whatever they want for noneconomic damages, including zero even when it seems preposterous that a person could suffer medical bills and have no pain and suffering.
Plaintiff's premises liability lawsuit alleged that her leg fell through the floor of a patio on defendant's property. The jury found the defendant partially responsible and awarded a whopping $6,207.08 with no damages for pain and suffering. Improbably, Plaintiff's attorney appealed, arguing that the damages award was inadequate as a matter of law and the trial court should have awarded damages (additur) or awarded a new trial.
The appellate court disagreed, finding juries can essentially do whatever they want. One thing is for sure: this jury was not a big fan of this plaintiff.
You can find the opinion here.
We've all been through it before...trying to locate either the defendant or the "friend of a friend" who was with our client at the time of the accident. When this person appears to be absolutely nowhere, it is worth checking out whether this defendant or witness is a guest of the state of Maryland.
Thankfully, people in jail are relatively easy to find. All but 8 state departments of corrections - including Maryland - makes available to the general public, information and photographs of inmates who are incarcerated. While originally created in the interest of public safety, it has become a tool in which witnesses have been located. There is no charge for these inmate locators, and new states are being added as they become available. You can chose the state you want to search and it will take you directly to their inmate locator. Some states will show pictures, release date, crimes, etc. while others will only list their age with no photo.
You have located your incarcerated witness, now what? If your defendant is in jail, you have an easy means of obtaining service of your Complaint. If you are trying to find a witness to the accident you can arrange a meeting and can videotape the inmate's trial testimony by videotape. This can usually be set up by contacting their caseworker, though every detention center is different. In most cases, you will need the warden's permission, as this process will bring in a lot of outsiders (all counsel, court reporter, videographer, etc.).
Clearly, there are some hoops to jump through to dealing with a defendant or witness that is jail in Maryland. While it may cause an accident lawyer a few headaches, finding and gathering testimony from inmates has and can be done.
The Colorado Supreme Court has upheld a $10 million verdict awarded to a truck driver who slipped and fell on grease while making a delivery to Walmart, resulting in a back injury requiring multiple spinal surgeries.
The Colorado Supreme Court reversed a lower court's determination that Wal-Mart Stores Inc. was entitled to a new trial. The female truck driver incurred approximately
$500,000 in medical bills, and was unable to return to work after the fall. As such, her truck, in which she also lived, was repossessed.
The award, originally $15 million, was reduced by $5 million due to the state's cap on noneconomic damages, making this one of the highest judgments ever in a slip-and-fall case.
Throughout the day, our law frim might access a hundred websites. The internet has become an absolute necessity to the daily workings of a law office that is hitting on all cylendars. Here are just a few useful links to push the ball forward on Maryland accident cases:
A wrongful death suit has been filed in Utah, stemming from a horrific boating accident.
The facts here are rather unbelievable. The suit contends that the driver of a boat negligently struck the decedent while she was swimming, causing critical injuries, as the propeller "tore" into her torso and lower abdomen. It gets worse from here. According to witnesses, after striking the swimmer, the boat turned around and the boat's occupants were overheard calling to the woman. They were heard yelling, "Hey lady, are you all right?" The witnesses said that the defendants talked to the decedent, but did not offer aide and left the scene, leaving her in the water bleeding and severely injured.
In addition to five John Does, three men were named in the suit, claiming that the men failed their "duty" to use "reasonable care" to avoid an accident. The suit further claims that the power boat was operated in a negligent and reckless manner. The driver and at least one other occupant had smoked marijuana prior to the accident, and at least three of the occupants had been drinking alcohol.
The lawsuit goes on to state that the Defendants' acts and omissions "were the result of willful and malicious conduct or conduct that manifests a knowing and reckless indifference toward, and a disregard of the rights of others." I’m not quite sure if being “under the influence” had anything to do with their choice to leave the scene without rendering assistance, but one could only hope that was not the case. I can’t imagine that an individual, let alone eight, could leave a woman struggling for her life, while they tore off hoping not to have been noticed – something rather difficult to do in a speed boat.
No criminal charges have been filed against the three men yet, as investigators were waiting for the results of forensic testing.
Last week, the Maryland Injury Lawyer Blog looked at the number of civil tort lawsuit filed in 2010 throughout Maryland. Here, we look at the number of motor tort lawsuits filed in Maryland in 2010, sorted by county:
Baltimore City: 1,463
Prince George's: 1,096
Baltimore: 966
Montgomery: 531
Continue reading "How Many Accident Lawsuits are Filed in Maryland?" »
