The Baltimore Sun quoted experts who questioned the decision not to arrest the suspect after the first hit and run. What I found very impressive was the parents/grandparents response to the concerns that the Hartford County police should have done more. The father/grandfather of the victims told the Baltimore Sun he didn't blame police for not arresting the suspect after the first accident. "Of course I'm upset, but I don't hold anything against our police officers." His wife added, ""His earlier accident in the day is not the accident that took our daughter and grandson's life. We have faith in law enforcement and if they're OK with letting him go back on the road, it's not the cause of the second accident."

Understandably at times, people often respond to a tragedy by blaming everyone in sight. I'm so impressed this family chose a different course.

The average trial value of knee injury cases involving knee lacerations, contusions and inflammation is $57,884 ($8,952 median). The average verdict for a knee strain case is $70,055 ($10,412 median). The average verdict for chondromalacia knee injury (abnormal softening of the knee cartilage on the underside of the patella) is $215,434 (median is $45,000).
I think these numbers are a little bit low but they are of interest to lawyers trying to determine how much is the settlement value of their knee injury case.

Certainly, it is a good idea to reward safe practices in the workplace so this sounds like a good plan.

Creative Settlement Agreements
The New and Improved Workers’ Compensation Jury Instructions
A Few Ideas for Better Results in Maryland Workers Comp Cases
5 Things That Annoy Workers' Comp Insurance Commissioners and 5 Things They Appreciate

Thanks for the comment which comes with a "that's what I would expect from a PI lawyer" smear. And it sounds, right. Last clear chance sounds like something you would expect to come out of the mouth of an insurance company accident lawyer, right?

But no. In Maryland, the "last clear chance" is not a defense asserted by
the defendant. Instead, it is asserted by Maryland accident lawyers on behalf of accident victims. It is asserted by plaintiffs. Las clear chance is a defense to a defendant's claim that the plaintiff was contributorily negligent. In Maryland, contributory negligence is generally a bar to recovery.

But the last clear chance doctrine allows a contributorily negligent accident victim to recover a financial award if: (i) the defendant is negligent; (ii) the plaintiff is contributorily negligent; and
(iii) the plaintiff makes a showing of something new or sequential, which affords the defendant a fresh opportunity (of which he fails to avail herself or himself) to avert the consequences of his own original negligence.

This doctrine of last clear chance has been the generally unchanged law in Maryland over the last 140 years.

In Maryland, the legislature made uninsured motorist coverage mandatory in 1975.
Click on the following link to read the primary statute in Maryland covering uninsured motorist claims.

Convincing the insurance company to provide a rental car is a hassle in some Maryland accident case, even if you have a lawyer much less without. This article on getting a rental car from the insurance company after an accident provides a few thoughts for those of you who are traveling solo without a Maryland accident lawyer.

Remember that one good way to take this issue out of play in the further is to purchase rental reimbursement coverage. It costs very little - only $12 a year under most auto insurance policy but it is an investment worth making.

So smart Maryland accident lawyers take the benefits that the system does provide for their clients. A big advantage plaintiffs’ lawyers have is that they are better able to dictate the pace of the progression of a case.

Some Maryland accident lawyers squander this great opportunity by failing to fully load the gun before firing it by filing a accident lawsuit. When filing a lawsuit, our accident lawyer serve the defendant with the Complaint, Interrogatories, Requests for Admission, Request for Production of Documents and Expert Designation. It is more work and requires you to be more proactive but helps you down the road - it is one more deadline you will need to meet down the road. In this regard, the road to legal malpractice is paved with lawyers who missed expert deadlines.

Still, make sure you put deadline to name experts on your discovery calendar and later check the designated experts to make sure you do not need additional experts for trial. Often, at the beginning of a case you will not believe you will require the testimony of an economist or a vocational rehabilitation expert, but you later find out that you do. Similarly, if your client is still suffering treating, you might need to name additional treating doctors.

Related Article:

Handling Property Damage Claims Without a Lawyer